It is shown so far, that service design can have a big impact in societies and that it
can in fact bring structural change.
Governments use service design to achieve social improvement. They use it to co- create with their active citizens a better and more sustainable environment and they use it to mobilize and motivate the idle ones to participate in this cooperation.
Citizens through the openness of public debate and their participation in the design
process feel that they have actively contributed to the resulting service and to an extent they feel to have changed, towards the better, the society in which they live. This brings the people the closest they have ever been to direct democracy since the ancient Athenian democracy.
According to Victor Papanek everyone is a designer. The more governments actively
use service design to restructure their way of managing their countries then the more
people will actually be designers of their own society.
“All men are designers” (Papanek 1985) All citizens are designers.
Service design, though, has also a big impact in societies with limited resources.
Through service design, either by state or private initiatives more and more people
have access to fundamental public services regardless of caste or wealth. Thus
service design helps expand equality among citizens.
In developing countries people generally cannot depend on the state to provide
solutions. When those solutions are provided they are usually inadequate. Thus,
communities and private parties have to rise to the occasion and design solutions
that fit their needs and that can be implemented with their limited resources. As an
effect, community spirit is encouraged and a sense of responsibility to the community
exists among members in those societies.
According to the ancient Greek definition of citizen, in a democratic system of
government we have to try to be citizens. By being citizens we are free members,
completely devoted to the city (or by extension to the country) and decide together.
Actively taking part in the decisions, together with our fellow countrymen, we secure
to ourselves a better future. According to Aristotle, “a man who did not care enough
to take part in the decisions about his city, he was not peaceable, but useless”.
I believe in real democracy. I believe in the power of communities to organize to
pursue their interests. I am passionate about helping people take a stand and make
a difference in the world. So says Aidan Ricketts and so say I. The biggest problem
in the world is not hunger, not disease, not conflict, not corruption. It is APATHY. The
fact that we see all these problems around us and we do nothing. - Michael Norton,
author, 365 Ways to Change the World (Rickets 2012)
Summarizing, service design, being used by governments and public
organizations has the power to promote alternative thinking in order for social
problems to be solved. Moreover, it has the ability to motivate, mobilize and activate
the citizens about matters that should already concern them. In addition, it is
explained how service design inspires community spirit and community responsibility,
especially in societies with limited resources.
All the above, lead people, knowingly or not, closer to democracy. Either by
becoming better citizens of a democratic system of government or by leading them to
actively seek a better system of government.
As a proposal for future research it would be interesting to investigate how those
effects of service design (social impact, community activation) can be manipulated by
private entities to pursue their own interests. For example whether a large
corporation could exploit the global awareness regarding climate change to promote
their own social brand.